Compare Chevrolet Spark EV vs Renault Twizy vs Renault Twingo II
Variants
1.2 58
1.2 76
1.2 GT 100
1.2 75 Euro5
1.5 dCi 64
RS 1.6 133
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
272 L / 9.6 cu-ft ~ 663 L / 23.4 cu-ft
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
4
2
4
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
185/55 R15, 195/55 R15
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
Turning Circle
10.3 m / 33.8 ft
6.8 m / 22.3 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
21.0 kWh (gross)
6.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1590 mm / 62.6 in
1454 mm / 57.2 in
Size | Length
3721 mm / 146.5 in
2338 mm / 92.0 in
Size | Width
1626 mm / 64.0 in
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1410.0 mm / 55.5 in
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1392.0 mm / 54.8 in
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
Weight
1300.0 kg / 2866.0 lbs
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2375 mm / 93.5 in
1686 mm / 66.4 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.6 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.2 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.64
Top Speed
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Power
143 hp / 106.6 kW
17 hp / 12.7 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Manual
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2016
2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
6%
28%
14%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Cute EV
- Very small turning circle
- Fun looks
- Small turning circle
- Stylish design
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Horrible range
- Poor battery degradation
- Not a real car
- Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
- Very little cargo space
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.