Compare Chevrolet Spark EV vs Chevrolet Bolt EV vs Renault Twingo III facelift

Variants
60 kWh
66 kWh
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
272 L / 9.6 cu-ft ~ 663 L / 23.4 cu-ft
478 L / 16.9 cu-ft ~ 1603 L / 56.6 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 264 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent
Tire Size
185/55 R15, 195/55 R15
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.3 m / 33.8 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
21.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1590 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
3721 mm / 146.5 in
4166 mm / 164.0 in
Size | Width
1626 mm / 64.0 in
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1410.0 mm / 55.5 in
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1392.0 mm / 54.8 in
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Weight
1300.0 kg / 2866.0 lbs
1616.0 kg / 3562.7 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2375 mm / 93.5 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.6 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.2 sec
6.5 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
Top Speed
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Power
143 hp / 106.6 kW
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
6%
17%
3%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Cute EV
  • Notable improvement in range
  • Very small turning circle
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible range
  • Poor battery degradation
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.