Compare Skoda Fabia 3 (NJ) vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169 vs Skoda Fabia 3 (NJ)

Skoda Fabia 3 (NJ)

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169

Skoda Fabia 3 (NJ)

Skoda Fabia 3 (NJ)Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169Skoda Fabia 3 (NJ)
Variants
1.0 60
1.0 75
1.0 60 2019+
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 2018+
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 110 DSG 2018+
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 2018+
1.0 TSI 95 DSG 2020+
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
1.0 60
1.0 75
1.0 60 2019+
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 2018+
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 110 DSG 2018+
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 2018+
1.0 TSI 95 DSG 2020+
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG

Reviews

Neofiliac score14%1%14%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Three-pointed star
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.