Compare Skoda Fabia 2 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo vs DS 3

Variants
1.2 60 Euro5
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 75
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 105
RS
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD
PureTech 110
PureTech 110 AT
PureTech 130
VTi 82
VTi 82 AT
BlueHDi 120
BlueHDi 99
THP 165

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.0 m / 32.8 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1458 mm / 57.4 in
Size | Length
3954 mm / 155.7 in
Size | Width
1642 mm / 64.6 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1715 mm / 67.5 in | 2004 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
Wheelbase
2511 mm / 98.9 in
2464 mm / 97.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
25%
18%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Beautiful design
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Very tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.