Compare Peugeot 207 vs Fiat 500e vs Peugeot 208 II

Variants
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 75
e-208 50 kWh
1.2 PureTech 100 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
198 L / 7.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 279.4x22.1 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 238.76x10.16 mm
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Elastic beam
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 185/55 R15 Rear wheel tires: 185/55 R15
Turning Circle
9.5 m / 31.2 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
24.0 kWh (gross)
50.0 kWh (gross) | 46.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Body Style
3-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1527 mm / 60.1 in
1430 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
3617 mm / 142.4 in
4055 mm / 159.6 in
Size | Width
1628 mm / 64.1 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1407.0 mm / 55.4 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1397.0 mm / 55.0 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Weight
1352.0 kg / 2980.7 lbs
Wheel Size
Front wheel rims: 5.5J x 15 Rear wheel rims: 6.5J x 15
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2301 mm / 90.6 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.311
Electric Range
350.0 km / 217.5 mi
Top Speed
142.0 km/h / 88.2 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Engine | Power
113 hp / 84.3 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2019
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
15%
16%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Cute exterior design
  • Small turning circle
  • Improved styling
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very little cargo space
  • Questionable battery degradation
  • Horrible styling
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor build quality
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.