Compare SEAT Ibiza 5 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta facelift
Variants
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 65
1.0 75
1.0 80
1.0 80 Euro6d
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 90
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 120 Euro6d
1.4 TB MultiAir 150
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120
1.6 MultiJet 120 TCT
1.75 TBi
2.0 MultiJet 170 Euro6d TCT
2.0 MultiJet 150
2.0 MultiJet 175 TCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1465 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4059 mm / 159.8 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
4351 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Wheelbase
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
17%
23%
46%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- More coherent design than Mk4
- Low official fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Sweet design
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small, unreliable engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- More emission control systems to fail
- More emission nonsense causing reliability concerns
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.