HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare SEAT Ibiza 5 vs Hyundai Accent 5 Hatchback vs Hyundai i10 II

Variants
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 65
1.0 75
1.0 80
1.0 80 Euro6d
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 90
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
1.6 GDI
1.6 GDI AT
1.6 DPi
1.6 DPi CVT
1.0
1.0 AT
1.0 LPG
1.25
1.25 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
616 L / 21.8 cu-ft
252 L / 8.9 cu-ft ~ 1046 L / 36.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
421 kg / 928 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
155/70 R13, 175/65 R14, 185/55 R15
Turning Circle
8.4 m / 27.6 ft
9.6 m / 31.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1500 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4059 mm / 159.8 in
4185 mm / 164.8 in
3665 mm / 144.3 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1729 mm / 68.1 in
1660 mm / 65.4 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1504.0 mm / 59.2 in
Weight
1159.0 kg / 2555.2 lbs
Wheel Size
4.5J x 13, 5.5J x 14, 5.5J x 14, 6.0J x 15
Wheelbase
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2385 mm / 93.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
10.5:1
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
15%
5%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • More coherent design than Mk4
  • Very small turning circle
  • Much improved styling
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Bland in styling
  • Low build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.