HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare SEAT Ibiza 5 vs Hyundai Accent 3 Hatchback vs Hyundai Veloster

Variants
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 65
1.0 75
1.0 80
1.0 80 Euro6d
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 90
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
1.4
1.4 AT
1.5 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 GDI
1.6 GDI AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
185/65 R14
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
4-door Hatchback
Platform
Hyundai-Kia PB

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
149 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4059 mm / 159.8 in
4045 mm / 159.3 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1462.0 mm / 57.6 in
Wheel Size
5.5 J x14
Wheelbase
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2500 mm / 98.4 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
77.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.4 mm / 3.4 in

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
18%
31%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • More coherent design than Mk4
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Small turning circle
  • Exceptional design
  • Small turning circle
  • Good manual transmission
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.