Compare SEAT Ibiza 5 vs SEAT Ibiza 4 vs Mercedes C-Class SportCoupe

Mercedes-Benz C-Class SportCoupe CL203 Hatchback (2000-2008)

SEAT | Cars

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Variants

1.0 TSI 115

1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d

1.0 TSI 115 DSG

1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 65

1.0 75

1.0 80

1.0 80 Euro6d

1.0 TGI 90 CNG

1.5 TSI 150 DSG

1.5 TSI 150

1.6 110

1.6 110 AT

1.6 90

1.6 TDI 80

1.6 TDI 95

1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d

1.6 TDI 95 DSG

1.0

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.2 60

1.2 70

1.2 TDI

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 DSG

1.2 TSI 85

1.2 TSI 90

1.4 85

1.4 85 2012+

1.4 TDI 105

1.4 TDI 75

1.4 TDI 80

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TSI 140

1.4 TSI 150

1.4 TSI 150 DSG

1.6

1.6 DSG

1.6 LPG

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DSG

1.9 TDI 105

1.9 TDI 90

2.0 TDI

C 30 CDI AMG AT

C 32 AMG AT

C 160

C 160 AT

C 180

C 180 AT

C 180 Kompressor

C 180 Kompressor AT

C 200 CDI

C 200 CDI AT

C 200 CGI

C 200 Kompressor Euro4

C 200 Kompressor

C 200 Kompressor Euro4 AT

C 200 Kompressor AT

C 220 CDI

C 220 CDI AT

C 220 CDI Euro4

C 220 CDI Euro4 AT

C 230

C 230 AT

C 230 Kompressor Euro4

C 230 Kompressor Euro4 AT

C 230 Kompressor

C 230 Kompressor AT

C 320

C 320 AT

C 350

C 350 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

62.0 L / 16.4 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.8 m / 35.3 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height

1444 mm / 56.9 in

Size | Length

4059 mm / 159.8 in

4343 mm / 171.0 in

Size | Width

1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)

1693 mm / 66.7 in

Track Width | Front

1525.0 mm / 60.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1505.0 mm / 59.3 in

Wheelbase

2564 mm / 100.9 in

2469 mm / 97.2 in

2715 mm / 106.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score

17%

16%

34%

Pros

Low official fuel consumption
More coherent design than Mk4

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

RWD-based
Fully independent suspensions

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Horrible AMGs

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.