Compare Seat Leon 3 vs SEAT Ibiza 5 vs Nissan Micra 4

Variants
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 TGI 110
1.4 TGI 110 CNG
1.4 TGI 110 CNG DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TGI 130
1.5 TGI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 105 DSG
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 115 DSG
1.6 TDI 90
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 DSG
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300 DSG
Cupra R 2.0 TSI 310
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 65
1.0 75
1.0 80
1.0 80 Euro6d
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 90
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
1.2
1.2 CVT
1.2 DIG-S
1.2 DIG-S CVT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
41.0 L / 10.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
9.3 m / 30.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Form Factor
3/5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1525 mm / 60.0 in
Size | Length
4059 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2450 mm / 96.5 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Displacement
1.2 L / 73.1 cu-in / 1198.0 cc
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
17%
4%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Looks fine from some angles
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • More coherent design than Mk4
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.