Compare SEAT Ibiza 4 vs Mercedes C-Class SportCoupe vs Mercedes B-Class W247

Variants
1.0
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 2012+
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.6
1.6 DSG
1.6 LPG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI
C 30 CDI AMG AT
C 32 AMG AT
C 160
C 160 AT
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 Kompressor
C 180 Kompressor AT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI AT
C 200 CGI
C 200 Kompressor Euro4
C 200 Kompressor
C 200 Kompressor Euro4 AT
C 200 Kompressor AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 220 CDI Euro4
C 220 CDI Euro4 AT
C 230
C 230 AT
C 230 Kompressor Euro4
C 230 Kompressor Euro4 AT
C 230 Kompressor
C 230 Kompressor AT
C 320
C 320 AT
C 350
C 350 AT
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4343 mm / 171.0 in
4419 mm / 174.0 in
Size | Width
1693 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT

Production

Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show

Reviews

Neofiliac score
16%
34%
27%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • RWD-based
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Better-looking than before
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible AMGs
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
  • Utilitarian

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.