HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare SEAT Ibiza 4 vs SEAT Ibiza 5 vs Hyundai Accent 5 Hatchback

Variants
1.0
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 2012+
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.6
1.6 DSG
1.6 LPG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 65
1.0 75
1.0 80
1.0 80 Euro6d
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 90
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
1.6 GDI
1.6 GDI AT
1.6 DPi
1.6 DPi CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
616 L / 21.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
421 kg / 928 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
8.4 m / 27.6 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
4059 mm / 159.8 in
4185 mm / 164.8 in
Size | Width
1693 mm / 66.7 in
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1729 mm / 68.1 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Weight
1159.0 kg / 2555.2 lbs
Wheelbase
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
16%
17%
15%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • More coherent design than Mk4
  • Very small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Bland in styling
  • Low build quality

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.