Compare Subaru Impreza 4 Hatchback vs Mercedes B-Class W247 vs Subaru Impreza 3 Hatchback

Subaru Impreza 4 (GP) Hatchback (2011-2016)

Mercedes-Benz B-Class W247 Hatchback (2018)

Subaru Impreza 3 (GH/GR) Hatchback (2007-2011)

Subaru | Cars

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Subaru | Cars

Variants

1.6i AWD

1.6i AWD CVT

1.6i FWD

1.6i FWD CVT

2.0i AWD

2.0i AWD CVT

B 160

B 180

B 180 DCT

B 180d

B 180d DCT

B 200

B 200 4MATIC DCT

B 200 DCT

B 200d DCT

B 220 4MATIC DCT

B 220 DCT

B 220d 4MATIC DCT

B 220d DCT

B 250 4MATIC DCT

B 250 DCT

B 250e DCT

1.5i

1.5i AT

2.0i AT

2.0R

2.0R AT

2.5

2.5 Turbo

2.5 Turbo AT

2.5i

2.5i AT

WRX 224hp

WRX 224hp AT

WRX 230hp

WRX 265hp

WRX STI 300hp

WRX STI 305hp

WRX STI 330hp

Capacity

Engine Oil Capacity

4.8 L / 5.1 qt

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

13.4 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

9.4 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

17.2 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Double-wishbone

Multi-link

Turning Circle

11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

15.6 kWh (gross)

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

145 mm / 5.7 in

104 mm / 4.1 in

Size | Height

1465 mm / 57.7 in

1562 mm / 61.5 in

Size | Length

4419 mm / 174.0 in

4415 mm / 173.8 in

Size | Width

1740 mm / 68.5 in

Track Width | Front

1510.0 mm / 59.4 in

1567.0 mm / 61.7 in

Track Width | Rear

1515.0 mm / 59.6 in

1547.0 mm / 60.9 in

Wheelbase

2645 mm / 104.1 in

2729 mm / 107.4 in

Performance

Electric Range

70.0 km / 43.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6

Euro 4

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.5:1

10.6:1

Transmission | Gears

6 / 7 / 8-speed

Transmission | Type

Manual / automatic / DCT

Production

Availability

2007 ~ 2011

Debut

2018 Paris Auto Show

Reviews

Neofiliac score

42%

27%

39%

Pros

Much sleeker styling
Higher engine output

Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Better-looking than before

Good WRX styling
Signature symmetric AWD
Small turning circle

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
No powerful engine options
Bad CVT

No powerful engine options
Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
Utilitarian

Bad automatic transmission
MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.