Compare Subaru Impreza 3 Hatchback vs Subaru Impreza 5 Hatchback facelift vs Lexus CT 200h
Variants
1.5i
1.5i AT
2.0i AT
2.0R
2.0R AT
2.5
2.5 Turbo
2.5 Turbo AT
2.5i
2.5i AT
WRX 224hp
WRX 224hp AT
WRX 230hp
WRX 265hp
WRX STI 300hp
WRX STI 305hp
WRX STI 330hp
1.6
2.0
Euro6
Euro5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft ~ 985 L / 34.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.9 L / 7.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door hybrid Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Length
4415 mm / 173.8 in
4475 mm / 176.2 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.8 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
99.0 hp / 73.8 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Specific Output
55.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Type
Lineartronic
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2011
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
39%
37%
31%
Pros
- Good WRX styling
- Signature symmetric AWD
- Small turning circle
- Overall good styling
- Characterful flat-4 engine
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Bad automatic transmission
- MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- CVT
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Poor handling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.