Compare BMW i3 I01 vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class W177 vs Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203

BMW i3 I01

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W177

Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203

BMW i3 I01Mercedes-Benz A-Class W177Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203
Variants
22 kWh
22 kWh + Range Extender
A 160
A 180
A 180 d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 d 4MATIC DCT
A 200 d DCT
A 200 DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220 d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 d DCT
A 220 DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e
A 35 AMG
A 45 AMG
A 45 S AMG
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score6%48%31%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Over low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Rather good design for a hatchback
  • Good performance in some models
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent build quality
  • RWD remained
  • Slight interior improvements
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Miserable electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable styling
  • Only available with small engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Cheaply put together

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.