Compare Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs Hyundai i20 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift

Variants
1.4 TB 105
1.4 MultiAir 170 TCT
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 MultiJet 105
1.750 TBi
2.0 MultiJet 140
2.0 MultiJet 150
2.0 MultiJet 170
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT
1.2 MPi
i20 N
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
0.0 L / 0.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc, 262 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
215/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.5 m / 34.6 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Weight
1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs
Wheelbase
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.9 m / 111.2 ft
CO2 Emission
158 g/km
Fuel Economy
7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
52%
35%
23%
Pros
  • Exceptionally sexy design
  • Sweet engines
  • Good manual transmission
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Limited to I4 engines
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.