Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) vs Renault Clio III

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955)

Renault Clio III

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2Alfa Romeo MiTo (955)Renault Clio III
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 95
1.4
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD
1.2 59
1.2 75
1.2 75 AT
1.2 78 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2i 101
1.2i 65
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 86 AT
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 88
2.0 138
2.0 138 AT
2.0 197
RS

Reviews

Neofiliac score23%25%9%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Beautiful design
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Very tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.