Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift vs Hyundai i20 III vs Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift

Hyundai i20 III

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) faceliftHyundai i20 IIIAlfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT
1.2 MPi
i20 N
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score23%35%23%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.