Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) vs Skoda Rapid Spaceback (NH1) vs Skoda Fabia 2 (5J)

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955)

Skoda Rapid Spaceback (NH1)

Skoda Fabia 2 (5J)

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955)Skoda Rapid Spaceback (NH1)Skoda Fabia 2 (5J)
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.4i 90
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.6i 110 Hp
1.6i 110 AT
1.2 60 Euro5
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 75
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 105
RS

Reviews

Neofiliac score25%8%11%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Beautiful design
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Very tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.