Compare Mini Hatch R56 vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169 vs Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203

Mini Hatch R56

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169

Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203

Mini Hatch R56Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203
Variants
Cooper 122PS
Cooper 122PS AT
Cooper 120PS
Cooper D 110PS
Cooper D 110PS AT
Cooper D 112PS
Cooper D 112PS AT
Cooper S 184PS
Cooper S 184PS AT
Cooper S 175PS
Cooper SD
Cooper SD AT
JCW
One 75PS
One MINIMALIST 75PS
One 98PS
One 98PS AT
One MINIMALIST 98PS
One D
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score26%1%31%
Pros
  • Iconic design
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Three-pointed star
  • RWD remained
  • Slight interior improvements
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Unreliable small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Cheaply put together

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.