Compare Mercedes B-Class W246 vs Skoda Roomster vs Nissan Cube 2
Variants
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI (OM651)
B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT
B 180 CDI (OM607)
B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 DCT
1.2 64
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 AT
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 103
1.4
1.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1780 L / 62.9 cu-ft
1250 L / 44.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Trailing arm
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
175/65 R14
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Minivan
Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1557 mm / 61.3 in
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1645 mm / 64.8 in
Size | Length
4359 mm / 171.6 in
3900 mm / 153.5 in
Size | Width
1684 mm / 66.3 in
1670 mm / 65.7 in
Track Width | Front
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Weight
1060.0 kg / 2336.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.9:1
Engine | Stroke
73.7 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
24%
17%
6%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
- Lots of usable space inside for such a small car
- Very cute
- Easy to park
- Easy to maneuver in tight spaces
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor fit and finish
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.