Compare Peugeot 2008 vs Peugeot 5008 II facelift vs Peugeot 4007

Variants
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
2.2D
2.2D AT
2.4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
702 L / 24.8 cu-ft ~ 2150 L / 75.9 cu-ft
510 L / 18.0 cu-ft ~ 1686 L / 59.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
7
5
Payload
620 kg / 1367 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
236 mm / 9.3 in
Size | Height
1556 mm / 61.3 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
1715 mm / 67.5 in
Size | Length
4159 mm / 163.7 in
4641 mm / 182.7 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1739 mm / 68.5 in
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1805 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
1601.0 mm / 63.0 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Weight
1790.0 kg / 3946.3 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2537 mm / 99.9 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine
2.4 l 16V 125 kW
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
90.5 mm / 3.6 in
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2020
2007 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
2%
24%
34%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to fix
  • Decent styling
  • High cargo capacity
  • Fully independent suspension setup
Cons
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.