Compare Peugeot 2008 (A94) vs Volvo XC90 vs Peugeot 5008 II (P87) facelift

Peugeot 2008 (A94)

Volvo XC90

Peugeot 5008 II (P87) facelift

Peugeot 2008 (A94)Volvo XC90Peugeot 5008 II (P87) facelift
Variants
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi
D3 AT
D3 AWD AT
2.5T AWD
2.5T AWD AT
T6 AWD
3.2 AWD
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score2%38%24%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to fix
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good exterior styling
  • Decent styling
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Pretends to be "SUV"
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.