Compare Nissan Qashqai 2 vs Nissan Qashqai 3 vs Nissan Rogue 2
Variants
1.2
1.2 Euro6
1.2 CVT
1.2 Euro6 CVT
1.3 140
1.3 160
1.3 160 DCT
1.5 dCi 110 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 DCT
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi Euro6
1.6 dCi AWD
1.6 dCi Euro6 AWD
1.6 dCi CVT
1.6 dCi Euro6 CVT
1.6
1.7 dCi
1.7 dCi AWD
1.7 dCi AWD CVT
1.3 140
1.3 158
1.3 AWD CVT
1.3 CVT
2.0 AWD Hybrid CVT
2.0 Hybrid CVT
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
18.6 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door mild-hybrid Crossover
Platform
Nissan CMF-C platform
Dimensions
Size | Height
1625 mm / 64.0 in
Size | Length
4425 mm / 174.2 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1839 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
EURO 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2021-02-18
Made In
UK
Reviews
Neofiliac score
14%
3%
37%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Not very ugly
- Cheap to buy
- Some offroad capabilities
- Improved styling
- Improved interior appointments
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Unreliable engines and CVT
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very ugly
- Horrible build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Only available with tiny engines
- Waste of raw materials
- No powerful engine options
- Bad engine reputation
- Unreliable CVTs
- Poor handling
- MacPherson front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.