Compare Nissan Qashqai 2 vs Subaru Crosstrek 2 vs Nissan Juke

Nissan Qashqai 2 (J11) Crossover (2013-2020)

Subaru Crosstrek 2 (GT) facelift Crossover (2020)

Nissan | Cars

Subaru | Cars

Nissan | Cars

Variants

1.2

1.2 Euro6

1.2 CVT

1.2 Euro6 CVT

1.3 140

1.3 160

1.3 160 DCT

1.5 dCi 110 Euro6

1.5 dCi 110

1.5 dCi 115

1.5 dCi 115 DCT

1.6 dCi

1.6 dCi Euro6

1.6 dCi AWD

1.6 dCi Euro6 AWD

1.6 dCi CVT

1.6 dCi Euro6 CVT

1.6

1.7 dCi

1.7 dCi AWD

1.7 dCi AWD CVT

2.0

2.0 CVT

2.5 CVT

1.2 DIG-T

1.5 dCi

1.5 dCi Euro6

1.5 dCi Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT

1.6 117PS

1.6 117PS CVT

1.6 94PS Euro6

1.6 94PS

1.6 DIG-T

1.6 DIG-T CVT

1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT

Nismo

Nismo AWD CVT

Nismo RS AWD CVT

Nismo RS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

589 L / 20.8 cu-ft ~ 1566 L / 55.3 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

63.0 L / 16.6 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs, 294.64 mm

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Disc, 274.32 mm

Offroad | Approach Angle

18.0 deg

22.0 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

19.7 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

28.6 deg

25.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Double-wishbone

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Turning Circle

10.7 m / 35.2 ft

10.8 m / 35.4 ft

10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

221 mm / 8.7 in

Size | Height

1615 mm / 63.6 in

Size | Length

4483 mm / 176.5 in

Track Width | Front

1549.0 mm / 61.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1560.0 mm / 61.4 in

1554.0 mm / 61.2 in

Wheelbase

2646 mm / 104.2 in

2664 mm / 104.9 in

2530 mm / 99.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.33

0.35

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive

Engine | Stroke

89.9 mm / 3.5 in

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Production

Availability

2020

Made In

Japan, Malaysia, Thailand

Reviews

Neofiliac score

14%

36%

Pros

Low official fuel consumption
Not very ugly

Some offroad capabilities
Characterful engines

So ugly it's endearing

Cons

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Unreliable engines and CVT
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Horrible CVT
Bad styling
Basic interior

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Horrible Renault engines
Bad CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.