Compare Nissan Qashqai vs Nissan Juke vs Renault Captur

Nissan Qashqai (J10) Crossover (2007-2014)

Renault Captur / Kaptur (J87) Crossover (2013-2019)

Nissan | Cars

Renault | Cars

Variants

1.5 dCi 103

1.5 dCi 106

1.5 dCi 110

1.6 114

1.6 117

1.6 117 CVT

1.6 dCi

1.6 dCi AWD

2.0

2.0 141 Euro5 AWD

2.0 AWD

2.0 AWD CVT

2.0 CVT

2.0 dCi

2.0 dCi AWD

2.0 dCi AWD AT

2.0 dCi Euro5

2.0 dCi Euro5 AWD

2.0 dCi Euro5 AWD AT

2.0 Euro5

2.0 Euro5 AWD CVT

2.0 Euro5 CVT

1.2 DIG-T

1.5 dCi

1.5 dCi Euro6

1.5 dCi Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT

1.6 117PS

1.6 117PS CVT

1.6 94PS Euro6

1.6 94PS

1.6 DIG-T

1.6 DIG-T CVT

1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT

Nismo

Nismo AWD CVT

Nismo RS AWD CVT

Nismo RS

TCe 90

TCe 120 AT

TCe 120

TCe 120 AT Stop&Start

TCe 130

dCi 110

dCi 110 Euro6b

dCi 90 AT

dCi 90 Euro6b

dCi 90 Euro6b AT

dCi 90

TCe 150

TCe 150 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1513 L / 53.4 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

65.0 L / 17.2 gal

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

19.2 deg

22.0 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

17.0 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

30.2 deg

25.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent, Elastic beam

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Water Fording

350 mm / 13.8 in

Construction

Body Style

5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

200 mm / 7.9 in

170 mm / 6.7 in

Size | Length

4122 mm / 162.3 in

Track Width | Front

1540.0 mm / 60.6 in

1531.0 mm / 60.3 in

Track Width | Rear

1516.0 mm / 59.7 in

Wheelbase

2630 mm / 103.5 in

2530 mm / 99.6 in

2606 mm / 102.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.35

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

76.0 mm / 3.0 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

16.0:1

Engine | Stroke

80.5 mm / 3.2 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

17%

Pros

Decent ground clearance

So ugly it's endearing

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
No powerful engine options
Lethargic, unreliable engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Bad CVT transmissions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Horrible Renault engines
Bad CVT

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions
Both ugly and forgettable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.