Compare Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (L538) vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs BMW X3 G01 LCI

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (L538)

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

BMW X3 G01 LCI

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (L538)Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)BMW X3 G01 LCI
Variants
eD4
SD4 190PS AWD
SD4 190PS AWD AT
Si4 240PS AWD 6AT
Si4 240PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS
TD4 150PS AWD
TD4 150PS AWD
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 180PS AWD
TD4 180PS AWD AT
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
20d
20i
30d
30e
30i
M40d
M40i

Reviews

Neofiliac score15%27%57%
Pros
  • Limited offroad capabilities
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent performance
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible styling
  • Unreliable ZF 9HP transmission
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Tiny engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.