Compare Volvo XC60 II (SPA) vs Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Peugeot 3008 II

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)

Jaguar E-Pace facelift

Peugeot 3008 II

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Jaguar E-Pace faceliftPeugeot 3008 II
Variants
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180

Reviews

Neofiliac score57%35%21%
Pros
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.