Compare Volvo XC60 II vs Subaru Crosstrek vs Subaru Forester 5

Variants
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
1.6 CVT
1.6 MT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0D
2.0DL
2.0 e-Boxer
2.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
1270 L / 44.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/55 R17
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
18.8 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1658 mm / 65.3 in
1730 mm / 68.1 in
Size | Length
4450 mm / 175.2 in
4625 mm / 182.1 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Weight
1655.0 kg / 3648.7 lbs
Wheel Size
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2635 mm / 103.7 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
11.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.2 sec
CO2 Emission
154 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
18.6 km / 11.6 mi
Fuel Economy
7.1 L/100km / 33.1 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
117.0 km/h / 72.7 mph
Towing Capacity
1870 kg / 4123 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic
Manual
CVT

Production

Availability
2017
2012 ~ 2017
2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
57%
33%
32%
Pros
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Fully independent suspension setup
  • High cargo capacity
  • Still available with naturally-aspirated H4 engines
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No manual transmission
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.