Compare Volvo XC60 II (SPA) vs Mazda CX-30 (DM) vs Mazda CX-7 (ER)

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)

Mazda CX-30 (DM)

Mazda CX-7 (ER)

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Mazda CX-30 (DM)Mazda CX-7 (ER)
Variants
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
1.8 Skyactiv-D
1.8 Skyactiv-D AT
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 e-Skyactiv X AT
2.0 e-Skyactiv X AWD
2.0 e-Skyactiv X AWD AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G
2.0 Skyactiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G AWD
2.0 Skyactiv-G AWD AT
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 Skyactiv-X AT
2.0 Skyactiv-X AWD
2.0 Skyactiv-X AWD AT
2.5 Skyactiv-G AT
2.2D
2.3 Turbo AWD AT
2.3 DiSi Turbo
2.3 DiSi Turbo AT
2.3 DiSi Turbo AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score57%54%36%
Pros
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Interesting engine lineup
  • Compression-ignition Skyactiv-X engine
  • Decent styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Good fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.