Compare Chevrolet Traverse vs GMC Acadia 2 vs GMC Acadia
Variants
281 AWD
281 FWD
288 AWD
288 FWD
2.5
2.5 AWD
3.6
3.6 AWD
275 FWD
275 AWD
281 FWD
281 AWD
288 FWD
288 AWD
Denali FWD
Denali AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
362 L / 12.8 cu-ft ~ 2237 L / 79.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
83.3 L / 22.0 gal
83.0 L / 21.9 gal
Passengers
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 331 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/70 R17, 255/65 R18, 255/55 R20
245/65 R17, 235/65 R18, 235/55 R20
Turning Circle
12.3 m / 40.3 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
12.3 m / 40.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
183 mm / 7.2 in
182 mm / 7.2 in
Size | Height
1745 mm / 68.7 in
Size | Length
4917 mm / 193.6 in
Size | Width
1915 mm / 75.4 in
Track Width | Front
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
Weight
1794.0 kg / 3955.1 lbs
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 20
17 in, 18 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2858 mm / 112.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
2358 kg / 5199 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc
3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
Engine | Stroke
85.6 mm / 3.4 in
85.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic 6T75
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2017
2016 ~ 2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
35%
37%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Rather reliable powertrain
- Reasonable cargo capacity
- Decent powertrain reliability
- High cargo capacity
- Rather reliable powertrain
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very bland, unfinished styling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- A bit ugly
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.