Compare Subaru Forester 2 vs Honda CR-V 5 facelift vs Honda Pilot

Variants
2.0X
2.0X AT
2.0XT
2.0XT AT
2.5 158PS
2.5 158PS AT
2.5 165PS
2.5 165PS AT
2.5 173PS
2.5 173PS AT
2.5T
1.5i AWD
1.5i
2.0 Hybrid AWD
3.5 243 AWD
3.5 248
3.5 248 AWD
3.5 258 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
406 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1525 L / 53.9 cu-ft
940 L / 33.2 cu-ft ~ 1945 L / 68.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.1 L / 9.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
8
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 300 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 312 mm
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R17 104H, 235/60 R18 103H, 235/55 R19 101H
235/70 R16
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Length
4450 mm / 175.2 in
4625 mm / 182.1 in
4775 mm / 188.0 in
Size | Width
1735 mm / 68.3 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.8 sec
Towing Capacity
680 kg / 1499 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV-2
Engine
J35A6
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
34%
37%
32%
Pros
  • Characteristic H4 engiens
  • Symmetric AWD
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good reliability record
  • Reliable engine
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • MacPherson front suspensions
  • CVT
  • Boring styling
  • Only available with small engines
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Boring design

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.