Compare Subaru Forester 2 vs Chevrolet Traverse vs Chevrolet Captiva

Subaru Forester 2 (SG) Crossover (2002-2008)

Chevrolet Traverse Crossover (2009-2017)

Chevrolet Captiva / Holden Captiva Crossover (2006-2018)

Subaru | Cars

Chevrolet | Cars

Variants

2.0X

2.0X AT

2.0XT

2.0XT AT

2.5 158PS

2.5 158PS AT

2.5 165PS

2.5 165PS AT

2.5 173PS

2.5 173PS AT

2.5T

281 AWD

281 FWD

288 AWD

288 FWD

2.0 VCDi 127

2.0 VCDi 127 AWD

2.0 VCDi 150

2.0 VCDi 150 AWD

2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT

2.2 VCDi 163

2.2 VCDi 163 AT

2.2 VCDi 163 AWD

2.2 VCDi 184 AT

2.2 VCDi 184 AWD

2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT

2.4

2.4 AWD

2.4 AWD AT

2.4 Ecotec 167

2.4 Ecotec 167 AT

2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD

2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT

3.0 AWD AT

3.2 AWD AT

Sport 2.4 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

406 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1525 L / 53.9 cu-ft

Coolant Capacity

11.2 L / 11.8 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

5.2 L / 5.5 qt

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

83.3 L / 22.0 gal

Passengers

5 / 7

Payload

545 kg / 1202 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Ventilated discs, 325 mm

Brakes | Rear

Ventilated discs, 331 mm

Offroad | Approach Angle

18.2 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

22.7 deg

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Double-wishbone

Multi-link

Tire Size

245/70 R17, 255/65 R18, 255/55 R20

Turning Circle

12.3 m / 40.3 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Crossover

5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

183 mm / 7.2 in

Size | Length

4450 mm / 175.2 in

Size | Width

1735 mm / 68.3 in

Track Width | Front

1495.0 mm / 58.9 in

Track Width | Rear

1485.0 mm / 58.5 in

Wheel Size

7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 20

Wheelbase

2525 mm / 99.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.38

Towing Capacity

2358 kg / 5199 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

94.0 mm / 3.7 in

Engine | Displacement

3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc

Engine | Stroke

85.6 mm / 3.4 in

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Transmission | Type

Automatic Hydra-Matic 6T75

Production

Availability

2009 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score

34%

21%

45%

Pros

Characteristic H4 engiens
Symmetric AWD

High cargo capacity
Rather reliable powertrain

Reasonable drivetrain reliability
Good towing capacity

Cons

No powerful engine options
MacPherson front suspensions

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Very bland, unfinished styling

Very ugly
Bad 0-100kph time
High 0.38 drag coefficient
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.