Compare DS 4 Crossback vs DS 3 Crossback vs Citroen C4 III

Variants
1.2 PureTech
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 BlueHDi AT
1.6 THP 165 AT
1.6 THP 210
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.5 BlueHDi 110
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-Tense
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 HDi 110
1.5 HDi 130 AT
e-C4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
359 L / 12.7 cu-ft
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft ~ 1050 L / 37.1 cu-ft
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1250 L / 44.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.5 L / 3.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 47.5 kWh (net)
50.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1529 mm / 60.2 in
1534 mm / 60.4 in
Size | Length
4284 mm / 168.7 in
4118 mm / 162.1 in
Size | Width
1810 mm / 71.3 in | 2052 mm / 80.8 in (mirror unfolded)
1800 mm / 70.9 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1834 mm / 72.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1527.0 mm / 60.1 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheelbase
2612 mm / 102.8 in
2558 mm / 100.7 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Electric Range
430.0 km / 267.2 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
YH01
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
8%
15%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Fooled some to think it's "SUV"
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No fully independent suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Poor handling
  • Horrible performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.