Compare Acura ZDX vs Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Acura MDX 3
Variants
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
3.0 Hybrid AWD
3.5 6AT
3.5 9AT
3.5 AWD 9AT
3.5 AWD 6AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
779 L / 27.5 cu-ft ~ 1971 L / 69.6 cu-ft
601 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
447 L / 15.8 cu-ft ~ 2574 L / 90.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
79.5 L / 21.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
22.0 deg
14.9 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
P255/50 R19 103H
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.6 m / 38.1 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
185 mm / 7.3 in
Size | Height
1596 mm / 62.8 in
1648 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4887 mm / 192.4 in
4395 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1995 mm / 78.5 in
1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1684.0 mm / 66.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1719.0 mm / 67.7 in
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
1684.0 mm / 66.3 in
Weight
2019.0 kg / 4451.1 lbs
Wheel Size
8.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2820 mm / 111.0 in
Performance
Electric Range
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
Fuel Economy
12.4 L/100km / 19.0 MPG (combined) | 14.7 L/100km / 16.0 MPG (urban) | 10.2 L/100km / 23.1 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine
J37A5
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Power
300.0 hp / 223.7 kW @ 6300 rpm
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
366 Nm / 269.9 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2013
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
13%
35%
65%
Pros
- Reliable V6 engine
- Low fuel consumption
- Much improved exterior styling
- Good engine reliability
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Rather ugly and pointless
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.