Compare Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Sportwagon vs Kia Cee'd SW (ED) vs Alfa Romeo 159 (939) Sportwagon

Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Sportwagon

Kia Cee'd SW (ED)

Alfa Romeo 159 (939) Sportwagon

Alfa Romeo 156 (932) SportwagonKia Cee'd SW (ED)Alfa Romeo 159 (939) Sportwagon
Variants
1.6 TS
1.8 TS
1.9 JTD 140
1.9 JTD 105
1.9 JTD 115
2.0 TS
2.0 JTS
2.4 JTD 136
2.4 JTD 150
2.4 JTD 175
2.5 V6 190
2.5 V6 190 AT
2.5 V6 192
2.5 V6 192 AT
2.5 V6 190 AT
3.2 GTA
1.4
1.4 CVVT
1.6 CRDi 115PS
1.6 CRDi 115PS AT
1.6 CRDi 128PS
1.6 CRDi 128PS AT
1.6 CRDi 90PS 5MT
1.6 CRDi 90PS 6MT
1.6 CVVT
1.6 CVVT AT
1.6D
1.6D AT
2.0 CRDi 140PS
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
1.75 TBi
1.8 MPI
1.9 JTDM 16V
1.9 JTDM 16V AT
1.9 JTDM 8V
1.9 JTS
2.0 JTDM 136PS
2.0 JTDM 170PS
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS Selespeed
2.4 JTDM 200PS
2.4 JTDM 200PS AT
2.4 JTDM 210PS
2.4 JTDM 210PS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS
3.2 V6 JTS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS Q4 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score33%26%46%
Pros
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Beautiful design (though less so than the sedan)
  • Good handling
  • Superb GTA
  • Small turning circle
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Potent engines
  • Still elegant
Cons
  • Outdated automatic transmission
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not as good-looking as the sedan

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.