Compare Alfa Romeo 159 (939) Sportwagon vs Volvo V60 II vs Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4

Alfa Romeo 159 (939) Sportwagon

Volvo V60 II

Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4

Alfa Romeo 159 (939) SportwagonVolvo V60 IIAlfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4
Variants
1.75 TBi
1.8 MPI
1.9 JTDM 16V
1.9 JTDM 16V AT
1.9 JTDM 8V
1.9 JTS
2.0 JTDM 136PS
2.0 JTDM 170PS
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS Selespeed
2.4 JTDM 200PS
2.4 JTDM 200PS AT
2.4 JTDM 210PS
2.4 JTDM 210PS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS
3.2 V6 JTS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS Q4 AT
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score46%62%28%
Pros
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Potent engines
  • Still elegant
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
  • Not as good-looking as the sedan
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Really, really ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.