Compare Kia Optima Sportswagon vs Kia Cee'd SW vs Ford Focus 3 Wagon facelift

Variants
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi DCT
1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.7 CRDi DCT
1.7 CRDi
2.0 CVVL
2.0 CVVL Euro6d
2.0 CVVL AT
2.0 CVVL Euro6d AT
2.0 GDI PHEV
2.0 GDI Euro6d PHEV
GT Euro6d AT
GT AT
1.4
1.4 CVVT
1.6 CRDi 115PS
1.6 CRDi 115PS AT
1.6 CRDi 128PS
1.6 CRDi 128PS AT
1.6 CRDi 90PS 5MT
1.6 CRDi 90PS 6MT
1.6 CVVT
1.6 CVVT AT
1.6D
1.6D AT
2.0 CRDi 140PS
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS stop&start
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS stop&start
1.5 TDCi 120PS
1.5 TDCi 95PS
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi 115PS
1.6 TDCi 115PS stop&start
1.6 TDCi 95PS
1.6 TDCi 95PS stop&start
1.6 Ti-VCT 105PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS AT
1.6 Ti-VCT 85PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT stop&start
2.0 TDCi 150PS stop&start
Focus ST
Focus ST Diesel
Focus ST stop&start

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
534 L / 18.9 cu-ft ~ 1664 L / 58.8 cu-ft
476 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 1502 L / 53.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.3 kWh (gross) | 9.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Length
4855 mm / 191.1 in
4470 mm / 176.0 in
Size | Width
1790 mm / 70.5 in
Track Width | Front
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheelbase
2805 mm / 110.4 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Electric Range
62.0 km / 38.5 mi
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
G4NG

Reviews

Neofiliac score
50%
26%
37%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
  • Rather good-looking
  • Small turning circle
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Higher output engines made available
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Further downsized engine lineup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.