Compare Kia Ceed 3 Sportswagon vs Kia Optima Sportswagon vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon facelift
Variants
1.0 T-GDI
1.4
1.4 T-GDI
1.4 T-GDI DCT
1.6 CRDi 115PS
1.6 CRDi 115PS DCT
1.6 CRDi 136PS
1.6 CRDi 136PS DCT
1.6 GDi PHEV DCT
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi DCT
1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.7 CRDi DCT
1.7 CRDi
2.0 CVVL
2.0 CVVL Euro6d
2.0 CVVL AT
2.0 CVVL Euro6d AT
2.0 GDI PHEV
2.0 GDI Euro6d PHEV
GT Euro6d AT
GT AT
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 iVCT 187 Hybrid
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
730 L / 25.8 cu-ft ~ 1605 L / 56.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.8 L / 4.0 qt
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
504 kg / 1111 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 305x25 mm
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 284x10 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
8.9 kWh (gross)
11.3 kWh (gross) | 9.0 kWh (net)
1.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
360.0 V
Dimensions
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1501 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4855 mm / 191.1 in
4869 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Weight
1458.0 kg / 3214.3 lbs
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2805 mm / 110.4 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
10.5 sec
CO2 Emission
28 ~ 30 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Electric Range
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
62.0 km / 38.5 mi
Fuel Economy
1.1 L/100km / 213.8 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
171.0 km/h / 106.3 mph, 120.0 km/h / 74.6 mph (EV mode)
Towing Capacity
600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine
G4NG
Production
Availability
2019 ~ 2022
Reviews
Neofiliac score
39%
50%
32%
Pros
- Down to very low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low official fuel consumption
- Rather good-looking
- Decent interior appointment
- Decent build quality
- Independent rear suspensions
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- MacPherson front suspension
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.