Compare Hyundai i40 Tourer vs Kia Optima Sportswagon vs Kia Carnival 4

Hyundai i40 Tourer Station Wagon (2011-2018)

Kia K5 / Optima 4 Sportswagon (JF) Station Wagon (2016-2020)

Kia Carnival / Sedona 4 (KA4) Minivan (2020)

Hyundai Motor | Cars

Kia | Cars

Variants

1.6 GDi

1.7 CRDi 116PS

1.7 CRDi 136PS

1.7 CRDi 136PS AT

1.7 CRDi 141PS

1.7 CRDi 141PS AT

1.7 VGT AT

2.0 GDi 165PS

2.0 GDi 165PS AT

2.0 GDi 177PS

2.0 GDi 177PS AT

2.0 MPi

2.0 MPi AT

1.6 CRDi

1.6 CRDi DCT

1.6 T-GDI DCT

1.7 CRDi DCT

1.7 CRDi

2.0 CVVL

2.0 CVVL Euro6d

2.0 CVVL AT

2.0 CVVL Euro6d AT

2.0 GDI PHEV

2.0 GDI Euro6d PHEV

GT Euro6d AT

GT AT

2.2d 11 Seat

2.2d 7 Seat

2.2d 9 Seat

3.5 11 Seat

3.5 7 Seat

3.5 9 Seat

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

6.7 L / 7.1 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.1 L / 4.3 qt

Fuel Capacity

70.0 L / 18.5 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Column-Mounted Electric Power steering

Steering Ratio

14.23:1

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Independent, spring

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.9 m / 35.9 ft

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

11.3 kWh (gross) | 9.0 kWh (net)

Battery | Type

Lithium-polymer

Battery | Voltage

360.0 V

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

5-door Minivan

Platform

Hyundai-Kia N3

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

140 mm / 5.5 in

Size | Height

1470 mm / 57.9 in

1740 mm / 68.5 in

Size | Length

4855 mm / 191.1 in

5155 mm / 203.0 in

Size | Width

1815 mm / 71.5 in

1995 mm / 78.5 in

Wheelbase

2770 mm / 109.1 in

2805 mm / 110.4 in

3090 mm / 121.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.29

0.28

Electric Range

62.0 km / 38.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive

Engine

G4NG

Transmission | Gears

8-speed

Transmission | Type

Automatic

Production

Availability

2020

Debut

2021-02-23

Made In

Korea

Reviews

Neofiliac score

28%

50%

55%

Pros

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Lots of space inside
Reliable engines

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Down to very low official fuel consumption
Rather good-looking

Good styling
Large interior space
Great comfort

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Poor handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.