HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Hyundai i40 Tourer vs Hyundai i30 CW vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon

Variants
1.6 GDi
1.7 CRDi 116PS
1.7 CRDi 136PS
1.7 CRDi 136PS AT
1.7 CRDi 141PS
1.7 CRDi 141PS AT
1.7 VGT AT
2.0 GDi 165PS
2.0 GDi 165PS AT
2.0 GDi 177PS
2.0 GDi 177PS AT
2.0 MPi
2.0 MPi AT
1.4
1.6 5MT
1.6 6MT
1.6 AT
1.6 CRDi 6MT
1.6 CRDi 5MT
1.6 CRDi AT
1.6 CRDi 5MT
1.6 CRDi 6MT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 CRDi
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost AT
1.5 TDCi
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi
1.6 TDCi ECOnetic
2.0 EcoBoost 203PS AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AWD
2.0 TDCi 150PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS
2.0 TDCi 180PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 180PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS AWD AT
2.0 TDCi 210PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
415 L / 14.7 cu-ft ~ 1395 L / 49.3 cu-ft
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1585 L / 56.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
62.5 L / 16.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Independent, spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.9 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1565 mm / 61.6 in
1501 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4867 mm / 191.6 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2770 mm / 109.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
32%
32%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Lots of space inside
  • Reliable engines
  • Small turning circle
  • High engine reliability
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Old 4-speed auto gearbox
  • Engines are too small
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.