Compare Hyundai i40 Tourer vs Ford Focus 3 Wagon facelift vs Hyundai i30 II Estate

Variants
1.6 GDi
1.7 CRDi 116PS
1.7 CRDi 136PS
1.7 CRDi 136PS AT
1.7 CRDi 141PS
1.7 CRDi 141PS AT
1.7 VGT AT
2.0 GDi 165PS
2.0 GDi 165PS AT
2.0 GDi 177PS
2.0 GDi 177PS AT
2.0 MPi
2.0 MPi AT
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS stop&start
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS stop&start
1.5 TDCi 120PS
1.5 TDCi 95PS
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi 115PS
1.6 TDCi 115PS stop&start
1.6 TDCi 95PS
1.6 TDCi 95PS stop&start
1.6 Ti-VCT 105PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS AT
1.6 Ti-VCT 85PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT stop&start
2.0 TDCi 150PS stop&start
Focus ST
Focus ST Diesel
Focus ST stop&start
1.4 CRDi
1.4 CVVT
1.4 MPi
1.6 CRDi 110PS
1.6 CRDi 110PS AT
1.6 CRDi 110PS DCT
1.6 CRDi 128PS
1.6 CRDi 128SP AT
1.6 CRDi 136PS
1.6 CRDi 136PS DCT
1.6 GDI
1.6 GDI AT
1.6 GDI Euro6
1.6 GDI Euro6
1.6 GDI Euro6 DCT
1.6 MPI Euro6
1.6 MPI
1.6 MPI Euro6 AT
1.6 MPI AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
476 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 1502 L / 53.0 cu-ft
528 L / 18.6 cu-ft ~ 1642 L / 58.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Independent, spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.9 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4485 mm / 176.6 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Wheelbase
2770 mm / 109.1 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
37%
36%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Lots of space inside
  • Reliable engines
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Higher output engines made available
  • Very low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Further downsized engine lineup
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.