Compare Citroen C3 Picasso vs Skoda Roomster vs Mercedes B-Class W246

Mercedes-Benz B-Class W246 Minivan (2011-2014)

Citroen | Cars

Skoda | Cars

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Variants

1.4 VTi

1.4 VTi Euro5

1.4 VTi LPG

1.6 e-HDi

1.6 HDi 109PS

1.6 HDi 112PS

1.6 HDi 90PS

1.6 VTi 115PS

1.6 VTi 120PS

1.2 64

1.2 70

1.2 TDI 75

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 AT

1.2 TSI 86

1.4 86 Euro5

1.4 86

1.4 TDI 70

1.4 TDI 80

1.6 105

1.6 105 AT

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 90

1.9 TDI 103

B 160 CDI

B 160 CDI DCT

B 180

B 180 DCT

B 180 CDI (OM651)

B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT

B 180 CDI (OM607)

B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT

B 200

B 200 DCT

B 200 CDI

B 200 CDI DCT

B 220 4MATIC DCT

B 220 CDI DCT

B 250 DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1780 L / 62.9 cu-ft

488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Drum

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, coil spring

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Trailing arm

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

5-door Minivan

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height

1669 mm / 65.7 in

1607 mm / 63.3 in

1557 mm / 61.3 in

Size | Length

4078 mm / 160.6 in

4359 mm / 171.6 in

Size | Width

1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)

1684 mm / 66.3 in

Track Width | Front

1466.0 mm / 57.7 in

1552.0 mm / 61.1 in

Track Width | Rear

1465.0 mm / 57.7 in

1549.0 mm / 61.0 in

Wheelbase

2540 mm / 100.0 in

2699 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.308

Towing Capacity

695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

83.0 mm / 3.3 in

Engine | Stroke

73.7 mm / 2.9 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

17%

24%

Pros

Easy to fix

Lots of usable space inside for such a small car

Low official fuel consumption
Less ugly than before

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Very ugly

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Basic suspension setup
Poor fit and finish

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.