Compare Renault Talisman Grandtour vs Toyota Avensis 3 Wagon facelift vs Renault Laguna 2 Estate
Variants
1.3 TCe 4CONTROL AT
1.3 TCe AT
1.5 ENERGY dCi 110PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS AT
1.6 ENERGY dCi 160PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 150PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 200PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS 4CONTROL
1.8 TCe 225PS 4CONTROL AT
1.8 TCe 225PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS AT
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 Valvematic
1.8 Valvematic CVT
2.0 D-4D
2.0 Valvematic
2.2 D-4D 150hp
2.2 D-CAT 150hp
2.2 D-CAT 150hp AT
2.2 D-CAT 177hp
1.5 dCi 101PS
1.5 dCi 105PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 82PS Euro4
1.6 107PS
1.6 112PS
1.8 120PS
1.9 dCi 100PS
1.9 dCi 107PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
2.0 136PS
GT
2.0 Turbo 170PS
2.0 Turbo 165PS
2.0 IDE 140PS
2.2 dCi 150PS
2.2 dCi 150PS AT
3.0 207PS
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent rear suspension
Tire Size
205/60 R16, 215/55 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1443 mm / 56.8 in
Size | Length
4866 mm / 191.6 in
4780 mm / 188.2 in
4695 mm / 184.8 in
Size | Width
1870 mm / 73.6 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1890 mm / 74.4 in (mirror folded)
1810 mm / 71.3 in
1772 mm / 69.8 in
Track Width | Front
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1609.0 mm / 63.3 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2809 mm / 110.6 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2740 mm / 107.9 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
157 ~ 159 g/km
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
26%
10%
Pros
- Very low official fuel consumption
- Looks better than the car is
- Reliable drivetrain
- Card key that allowed the owner to show off at the time
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Worse styling than pre-facelift
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No fully independent suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.