Compare Mazda 6 III Wagon facelift vs Mazda 6 Wagon facelift vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift

Variants
2.0 Skyactiv-G 145PS
2.0 Skyactiv-G 165PS
2.0 Skyactiv-G 165PS AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS 4x4
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS 4x4 AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS AT
2.5 Skyactiv-G AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 CD 121PS
2.0 CD 143PS
2.3
2.3 AT
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
522 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1664 L / 58.8 cu-ft
505 L / 17.8 cu-ft ~ 1712 L / 60.5 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4805 mm / 189.2 in
4710 mm / 185.4 in
4595 mm / 180.9 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Euro 6 W
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015
2005 ~ 2008
2015 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
30%
57%
30%
Pros
  • Handsome styling
  • Great engine lineup
  • 6-speed manual widely available
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Reliable engines
  • Gorgeous design
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
Cons
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • No real improvement over pre-facelift
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.