Compare Mazda 6 II / Atenza (GH) facelift vs Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) vs Volkswagen Passat B5.5 Variant (3B)

Mazda 6 II / Atenza (GH) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1)

Volkswagen Passat B5.5 Variant (3B)

Mazda 6 II / Atenza (GH) faceliftMazda 6 / Atenza (GG1)Volkswagen Passat B5.5 Variant (3B)
Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2 CD 129PS
2.2 CD 163PS
2.2 CD 180PS
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 CD 121PS
2.0 CD 136PS
2.3
2.3 AWD AT
1.8 T
1.8 T AT
1.9 TDI 100PS
1.9 TDI 100PS AT
1.9 TDI 130PS 4MOTION
1.9 TDI 130PS 5MT
1.9 TDI 130PS 6MT
1.9 TDI 130PS AT
2.0
2.3 VR5
2.3 VR5 4MOTION
2.3 VR5 AT
2.5 TDI 4MOTION
2.5 TDI 4MOTION AT
2.5 TDI AT
2.5 TDI V6
2.8 4MOTION
2.8 4MOTION AT
4.0 W8 4MOTION
4.0 W8 4MOTION AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score46%46%68%
Pros
  • Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Somehow more elegant than pre-facelift
  • Great engines
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Reliable engine lineup
  • Elegant design
  • Superb suspension setup in 4Motion models
  • Wonderful engines, including VR5, VR6, and W8
  • Clean, classic styling
  • No bullshit
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Semi-independent suspension for FWD models

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.