Compare Mazda 6 Wagon facelift vs Volkswagen Passat B5.5 Variant vs Volkswagen Golf 7 Variant

Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) facelift Station Wagon (2005-2008)

Volkswagen Passat B5.5 Variant (3B) Station Wagon (2000-2005)

Volkswagen Golf Mk7 Variant (AU) Station Wagon (2012-2017)

Mazda | Cars

Volkswagen | Cars

Variants

1.8

2.0

2.0 AT

2.0 CD 121PS

2.0 CD 143PS

2.3

2.3 AT

1.8 T

1.8 T AT

1.9 TDI 100PS

1.9 TDI 100PS AT

1.9 TDI 130PS 4MOTION

1.9 TDI 130PS 5MT

1.9 TDI 130PS 6MT

1.9 TDI 130PS AT

2.0

2.3 VR5

2.3 VR5 4MOTION

2.3 VR5 AT

2.5 TDI 4MOTION

2.5 TDI 4MOTION AT

2.5 TDI AT

2.5 TDI V6

2.8 4MOTION

2.8 4MOTION AT

4.0 W8 4MOTION

4.0 W8 4MOTION AT

1.0 TSI BlueMotion

1.0 TSI BlueMotion DSG

1.2 TSI 105PS

1.2 TSI 105PS DSG

1.2 TSI 110PS

1.2 TSI 110PS DSG

1.2 TSI 85PS

1.4 TGI BlueMotion

1.4 TGI BlueMotion DSG

1.4 TSI 122PS

1.4 TSI 122PS DSG

1.4 TSI 125PS

1.4 TSI 125PS DSG

1.4 TSI 140PS

1.4 TSI 140PS DSG

1.4 TSI 150PS

1.4 TSI 150PS DSG

1.6 TDI 105PS

1.6 TDI 105PS 4MOTION

1.6 TDI 105PS DSG

1.6 TDI 110PS

1.6 TDI 110PS 4MOTION

1.6 TDI 110PS BlueMotion

1.6 TDI 110PS DSG

1.6 TDI 90PS

2.0 TDI

2.0 TDI 4MOTION

2.0 TDI DSG

GTD

GTD DSG

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

505 L / 17.8 cu-ft ~ 1712 L / 60.5 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

64.0 L / 16.9 gal

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

Double-wishbone

Multi-link

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.8 m / 35.4 ft

11.4 m / 37.4 ft

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

130 mm / 5.1 in

Size | Height

1480 mm / 58.3 in

Size | Length

4710 mm / 185.4 in

4682 mm / 184.3 in

Size | Width

1780 mm / 70.1 in

1746 mm / 68.7 in

Wheelbase

2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.32

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 4

Euro 6

Production

Availability

2005 ~ 2008

Reviews

Neofiliac score

57%

68%

22%

Pros

Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Reliable engines
Gorgeous design

Superb suspension setup in 4Motion models
Wonderful engines, including VR5, VR6, and W8
Clean, classic styling
No bullshit

Down to very low 3.5L/100km fuel consumption

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options

Semi-independent suspension for FWD models

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Somewhat ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.