Compare Honda Airwave vs Honda Accord 7 Tourer vs Mazda 6 II Wagon
Variants
FWD
AWD
2.0 i-VTEC
2.2 i-CTDi
2.4 i-VTEC
2.4 i-VTEC AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 CD 140PS
2.2 CD 163PS
2.2 CD 185PS
2.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
473 L / 16.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
185 kg / 408 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Dependent spring with anti-roll bar
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1530 mm / 60.2 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1490 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4350 mm / 171.3 in
4750 mm / 187.0 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1455.0 mm / 57.3 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheelbase
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Fuel Economy
5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
170.0 km/h / 105.6 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.3 cu-in / 1496.0 cc
Engine | Power
110.0 hp / 82.0 kW @ 5800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
73.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
143 Nm / 105.5 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
13%
39%
42%
Pros
- Rather good design
- Solid engine
- Decent styling
- Great engines
- Sweet manual transmissions
- Surprisingly good double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good engline reliability
- Improved interior
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Slightly less beautiful than Mk1
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.