Compare Peugeot 308 SW II vs Peugeot 508 SW vs Peugeot 407 SW
Variants
1.2 PureTech 110PS
1.2 PureTech 110PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 110PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 102PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 100PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 PureTech AT
1.6 THP
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS 2017-2018
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS AT
2.0 BlueHDi 177PS AT
GT 1.6 THP
GT 2.0 BlueHDi AT
GT 2.0 BlueHDi 2017-2018
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 THP
1.6 THP AT
1.6 VTi
2.0 HDi 140PS
2.0 HDi 163PS
2.0 HDi 163PS AT
2.2 HDi AT
1.6 HDi
1.8
2.0 HDi
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2 HDi
2.2
2.2 AT
3.0
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
610 L / 21.5 cu-ft ~ 1660 L / 58.6 cu-ft
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1476 mm / 58.1 in
1486 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4585 mm / 180.5 in
4813 mm / 189.5 in
4763 mm / 187.5 in
Size | Width
1920 mm / 75.6 in
1811 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
Wheelbase
2730 mm / 107.5 in
2817 mm / 110.9 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
165 g/km
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2014
2004 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
15%
21%
23%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Not ugly anymore
- Much better-looking than the 407 SW
- Easy to DIY
- Parts are cheap
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.