Compare Peugeot 407 SW vs Peugeot 207 SW vs Renault Clio 4 Wagon facelift

Variants
1.6 HDi
1.8
2.0 HDi
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2 HDi
2.2
2.2 AT
3.0
1.4
1.4 VTi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 RC
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi AT
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 75
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 90

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
337 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1258 L / 44.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1486 mm / 58.5 in
1527 mm / 60.1 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4763 mm / 187.5 in
4156 mm / 163.6 in
4267 mm / 168.0 in
Size | Width
1811 mm / 71.3 in
1748 mm / 68.8 in | 1972 mm / 77.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1818 mm / 71.6 in (mirror folded)
1732 mm / 68.2 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
1461.0 mm / 57.5 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheelbase
2725 mm / 107.3 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
165 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Stroke
73.1 mm / 2.9 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2010
2007 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
3%
12%
Pros
  • Easy to DIY
  • Parts are cheap
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension
  • Easy to DIY
  • Parts are cheap
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Ugly
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.